Sacred Science - cntd

Sacred Science - ctd

A famous example (perhaps) of the technologies available to those who conform to the Laws of Nature might well be the Brazen Heads as created by such luminaries as Roger Bacon and Albertus Magnus?

These, to us mysterious objects, which well testified to and described by observers at the time. May well be the results of science that cannot be understood and cannot work unless the "moral" Laws of Nature are also being applied?

Of course this might seem to be ludicrous to the purely materialistic, but as Einstein pointed out, most new ideas do seem ludicrous at first (which may not be such a bad thing).

The great blocks of stone at Baalbeck - so large no modern land crane could move them, yet moved they were long ago - might perhaps have been worked upon by practitioners of science who were living according to those "moral" Laws of Nature?

It might well be an interesting undertaking to examine some of the mysteries of the ancient world, in light of this form of science being described?

But - whilst doing so restraining the urge to form a theory. Doing what Goethe suggested and allowing the participation/observation to proceed before any easy (and limiting/blinkering) conclusions are reached.

Something else worth examining would be those enigma`s of contemporary science where experiments are difficult to repeat - for example the apparent success of Cold Fusion (Fleischmann, et al), and the widely reported case of a model shop owner having an accidentally amputated finger regrow after applying some of the powder (dubbed Fairy Dust by the media) developed in the labs of the University of Detroit.

Science, it was assumed near the end of the nineteenth century, had discovered all the major Laws of Nature; then along came Relativity and Quantum Physics.

The same situation, where it is assumed all the major Laws of Nature have been discovered, seems to exist now.

But I would suggest there are many more to discover - ones we already know of but call Morality and perhaps more. The question is how might these Laws be discerned to the satisfaction of Science?

Well perhaps one place to start is by carrying out the examinations as mentioned above? And of course (considering his work led me in this direction) by trying out such methods, applying these postulated Laws of Nature, to get Viktor Schauberger`s machines working.

It might be worth noting that in Alchemy (from which much if not most modern Chemistry - and other sciences - originates) the state of mind of the Alchemical practitioner was considered to be a central part of the practice. Viktor Schauberger himself studied The Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistus. In fact until relatively recently science was regarded as a Moral Art - with the "Enlightenment" this view was mostly forgotten, apart from some who still carried that Holistic "flame", Goethe being a prime example.

Perhaps like so much else they got right, the Alchemists intuitively were aware of Laws of Nature that (so far at least) contemporary science has not perceived?

It will be interesting to find out?